Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Bernard Tomic vs Jaan-Frederik Brunken Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Tomic vs Brunken analysis and find out who is favored!
Bernard Tomic vs Jaan-Frederik Brunken Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Tomic 0 - 0 Brunken
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Tomic has won 50.64% of points on their second serve, while Brunken has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Tomic, in recent form, has won 53.37% of their opponent's second serve points, while Brunken has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 29.76% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Tomic has saved 64.47% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Brunken has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Tomic has won 63.41% of matches played (W/L 52/ 30), with Brunken winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Tomic has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 62% (W/L 266/ 160), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 40% (W/L 51/ 75). Brunken has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 55% (W/L 40/ 33), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 49% (W/L 20/ 21).
- Player level: In the last year, Tomic has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 50.94% of matches (W/L 27/ 26), where as Brunken has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Tomic has played against opponents with an average rank of 261.34 while Brunken has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Tomic has won 62% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Brunken has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Tomic has converted 46.34% of breakpoint opportunities, and Brunken has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
250
Rank
17
High
31
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
469
High
34
Age
R
Plays
W
W
W
L
W
L
W
W
W
W
Form
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
W
W
56% (411-320)
Career Total W/L
51% (119-116)
68% (30-14)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$3,883,920
Career Prize Money
$4,115
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Bernard Tomic vs Jaan-Frederik Brunken For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Tomic VS Brunken
Sportsbook
Offer
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Bernard Tomic | Jaan-Frederik Brunken |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 68% (30/14) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 66% (63/33) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 55% (503/416) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 67% (22/11) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 73% (8/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.6 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 270 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.16 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 70 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:26:26 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 244.89 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 58% (1598/2779) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 75% (1199/1598) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 51% (598/1181) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 46% (114/246) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 39% (1054/2718) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 54% (13/11) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 85% (17/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 71% (30/42) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 73% (11/15) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 73% (8/11) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 93% (27/25) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 7% (27/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 31% (16/5) | 0% (0/0) |
Bernard Tomic Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats 
Bernard Tomic
Player
Alexander Kotzen
40%
(
20 of
50)
1st Serve %
48%
(
27 of
56)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
95%
(
19 of
20)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
14 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
56)
62
Total Points Won
44
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Bernard Tomic
Player
Govind Nanda
47%
(
33 of
70)
1st Serve %
58%
(
28 of
48)
7
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
43%
(
16 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
39%
(
27 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Bernard Tomic
Player
Jonah Braswell
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve %
64%
(
32 of
50)
15
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
22 of
32)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
4 of
18)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
34%
(
18 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
24 of
50)
59
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Bernard Tomic
Player
Chad Kissell
54%
(
37 of
68)
1st Serve %
59%
(
38 of
64)
8
Aces
9
2
Double Faults
4
84%
(
31 of
37)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
31 of
38)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
28%
(
19 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
21 of
64)
70
Total Points Won
62
|
6-3 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sebastian Gorzny
Player
Bernard Tomic
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve %
54%
(
22 of
41)
6
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
14 of
22)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
25%
(
12 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
19 of
41)
55
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Bernard Tomic
Player
Alex Rybakov
47%
(
29 of
62)
1st Serve %
70%
(
48 of
69)
1
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
1
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
34%
(
21 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
29 of
69)
70
Total Points Won
61
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Yuta Shimizu
Player
Bernard Tomic
68%
(
13 of
19)
1st Serve %
52%
(
11 of
21)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
85%
(
11 of
13)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
67%
(
4 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
4 of
19)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
14 of
21)
29
Total Points Won
11
|
6-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Bernard Tomic
Player
Thai Kwiatkowski
47%
(
34 of
73)
1st Serve %
56%
(
50 of
89)
8
Aces
8
7
Double Faults
8
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
36%
(
14 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
12 of
39)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
45%
(
33 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
45 of
89)
85
Total Points Won
77
|
3-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Andres Andrade
Player
Bernard Tomic
0%
(
0 of
0)
1st Serve %
0%
(
0 of
4)
-
Aces
-
-
Double Faults
-
0%
(
0 of
0)
1st Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
0%
(
0 of
0)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
0%
(
0 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
0%
(
0 of
0)
Rtn Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
3
Total Points Won
1
|
w/o | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Bernard Tomic
Player
Axel Nefve
52%
(
43 of
83)
1st Serve %
71%
(
75 of
106)
6
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
50 of
75)
53%
(
21 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
8 of
31)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
39%
(
32 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
48 of
106)
99
Total Points Won
90
|
6-2 2-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Jaan-Frederik Brunken Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R2 | 6-2 4-6 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q2 |
Stats
Goran Tosic
Player
Jaan-Frederik Brunken
64%
(
34 of
53)
1st Serve %
47%
(
26 of
55)
4
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
0
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
21 of
26)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
28%
(
15 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
24 of
55)
62
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jaan-Frederik Brunken
Player
Urs Thurau
55%
(
27 of
49)
1st Serve %
64%
(
28 of
44)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
85%
(
23 of
27)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
12 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
19 of
44)
56
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 2-6 7-6(8) 7-5 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 4-6 6-2 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 4-6 6-4 3-1 ret. | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-1 6-0 | H2H | |||
view more
Tomic Vs Brunken Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Tomic are available here and Brunken photos here.
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Bernard Tomic
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
